Bhubaneswar: The political landscape in Odisha’s Biju Janata Dal (BJD) is witnessing increasing internal turmoil, with senior leaders openly questioning the role of V.K. Pandian, despite his declared “Sanyas” (retirement) from active politics.
Following BJD leader Pravat Tripathy, senior BJD leader and former Minister Prafulla Mallick has now voiced concerns regarding V.K. Pandian’s continued influence within the party.
This surge of dissenting voices indicates a growing unease among BJD members about Shri Pandian’s perceived role, even after his announcement of stepping back from politics.
Another BJD leader Nrusingha Sahu, has also publically stated that “BJD lost due to VK Pandian’s political entry”.
The core of the issue revolves around allegations of Shri Pandian’s continued influence on party decisions, despite his stated retirement.
There are also concerns regarding the BJD’s performance in the recent elections, with some party members attributing the setbacks to Shri Pandian’s involvement.
There has also been issues raised concerning the parties actions concerning the Waqf bill in the Rajya Sabha.
These public criticisms highlight potential fissures within the BJD, raising questions about the party’s internal dynamics and future direction.
The response of BJD Supremo Naveen Patnaik while defending V.K. Pandian for his good work has ignited internal strife within the BJD, which has significant political implications for Odisha, potentially affecting the state’s political landscape.
Both BJP and Congress are likely to capitalize on these internal divisions within the BJD.
In essence, the situation reflects a period of internal reassessment and potential realignment within the BJD, with the role of V.K. Pandian at the center of the controversy.